首页> 外文OA文献 >EnROL: a multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.
【2h】

EnROL: a multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

机译:EnROL:一项针对常规结直肠癌与腹腔镜手术结直肠癌的多中心随机对照试验,旨在提高恢复水平。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: During the last two decades the use of laparoscopic resection and a multimodal approach known as an enhanced recovery programme, have been major changes in colorectal perioperative care. Clinical outcome improves using laparoscopic surgery to resect colorectal cancer but until recently no multicentre trial evidence had been reported regarding whether the benefits of laparoscopy still exist when open surgery is optimized within an enhanced recovery programme. The EnROL trial (Enhanced Recovery Open versus Laparoscopic) examines the hypothesis that laparoscopic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme will provide superior postoperative outcomes when compared to conventional open resection of colorectal cancer within the same programme. METHODS/DESIGN: EnROL is a phase III, multicentre, randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open resection of colon and rectal cancer with blinding of patients and outcome observers to the treatment allocation for the first 7 days post-operatively, or until discharge if earlier. 202 patients will be recruited at approximately 12 UK hospitals and randomised using minimization at a central computer system in a 1:1 ratio. Recruiting surgeons will previously have performed >100 laparoscopic colorectal resections and >50 open total mesorectal excisions to minimize conversion. Eligible patients are those suitable for elective resection using either technique. Excluded patients include: those with acute intestinal obstruction and patients in whom conversion from laparoscopic to open procedure is likely. The primary outcome is physical fatigue as measured by the physical fatigue domain of the multidimensional fatigue inventory 20 (MFI-20) with secondary outcomes including postoperative hospital stay; complications; reoperation and readmission; quality of life indicators; cosmetic assessments; standardized performance indicators; health economic analysis; the other four domains of the MFI-20. Pathological assessment of surgical quality will also be undertaken and compliance with the enhanced recovery programme will be recorded for all patients. DISCUSSION: Should this trial demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery confers a significant clinical and/or health economic benefit this will further support the transition to this type of surgery, with implications for the training of surgeons and resource allocation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN48516968.
机译:背景:在过去的二十年中,腹腔镜切除术和称为增强恢复程序的多模式方法已成为大肠癌围手术期护理的重大变化。使用腹腔镜手术切除结直肠癌可改善临床结局,但直到最近为止,还没有关于开放式手术在增强恢复方案中进行优化时腹腔镜检查是否仍存在益处的多中心试验证据的报道。这项纳入试验(增强型开放性腹腔镜手术与腹腔镜手术)检验了以下假设:与同一方案中常规的大肠癌开放性切除术相比,增强型恢复程序中的腹腔镜手术将提供更好的术后效果。方法/设计:这项研究是一项III期,多中心,腹腔镜与结肠及直肠癌开放性切除术的随机,随机对照试验,患者和结局观察者不愿接受手术后前7天或直到出院前的治疗分配。将在大约12家英国医院中招募202名患者,并在中央计算机系统上以1:1的比例使用最小化方法将其随机分组。招聘外科医生以前将进行100多次腹腔镜结直肠切除术和50多次开放的全直肠系膜切除术,以最大程度地减少转化。符合条件的患者是适合使用两种技术进行选择性切除的患者。排除的患者包括:患有急性肠梗阻的患者以及可能从腹腔镜手术转变为开放手术的患者。主要结果是身体疲劳,其通过多维疲劳清单20(MFI-20)的身体疲劳域来衡量,其次要结果包括术后住院时间;并发症;再次手术和再次入院;生活质量指标;外观评估;标准化的绩效指标;卫生经济分析; MFI-20的其他四个域。还将对手术质量进行病理学评估,并记录所有患者的康复计划。讨论:如果该试验证明腹腔镜手术能带来重大的临床和/或健康经济效益,则将进一步支持向此类手术的过渡,对外科医师的培训和资源分配具有重要意义。试用注册:ISRCTN48516968。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号